- AAPL’s 3QFY14 was mixed, with sales 1.5% below consensus but EPS 4% above on impressive 39.4% GMs. iPhones were in-line with strong expectations, but iPads were down YoY – again!
- A revenue miss, 6% growth, the fast erosion of iPad sales, and tepid 4QFY14 guidance might have ordinarily spooked investors, but iPhone 6/iWatch hype has most looking ahead to Dec.
- MSFT beat topline expectations by 1.7%, with 10% YoY organic growth driven by strong enterprise sales. EPS would have beaten by $0.06 without one-time Nokia and other charges.
- More Nokia write downs and the costs of the upcoming layoffs will hit future quarters, but a 147% YoY increase in cloud sales, now 11%+ of total, speaks to MSFT’s real growth potential.
With the rise of the mobile/cloud era of computing, the nature of the Apple/Microsoft rivalry has changed dramatically. New rivalries with the likes of Samsung, Google and Amazon Web Services have pushed the traditional “Mac vs. PC” battles to the back burner. Still, with the two erstwhile enemies reporting on the same night, it’s an opportunity to engage in the nostalgia of comparing the two companies again.
Both companies’ results had a little bit of hair on them. Apple crushed its EPS bogie by 5 cents, juicing those earnings with 39.4% gross margins, 140bp higher than analyst expectations and the highest level since 4QFY12. However, and it’s a big however, Apple revenues were $600M below expectations at $37.4B, with disappointments in both iPad and iPhone sales not mitigated by the upside surprise in Mac revenues. Guidance for next quarter was weak, suggesting more of the same in September and pushing all of the chips on the Holiday quarter and the hotly anticipated debuts of the iPhone 6 and the iWatch. Microsoft, on the other hand, handily beat revenue expectations, with $23.4B versus the $23.0B expected, but fell short on earnings, delivering $0.55 in EPS versus the $0.60 consensus due to initial write downs associated with the acquisition of Nokia’s handset business. Absent the Nokia charges and some other one-time items, Microsoft could have beaten by $0.06.